Friday, February15, 2019

What is the handicap of an L-36?

Well, it depends.

A personal observation on the L-36. The handicap doesn't matter that much. If there is a lot of wind and your boat is in good shape, you will win. If there is little wind, you will lose. The handicaps below reflect this. Areas of light wind carry a handicap of 218. SF Bay with its strong winds give 150. That is a huge difference. In strong winds I can beat boats with handicaps of 126 boat for boat. In light winds, they might be 90 minutes ahead in a 90 minute race.

UNITED STATES PERFORMANCE HANDICAP RACING FLEET this number (126) is uncalibrated and should not be used -- sorry for posting it. I think it is a typo as well -- should have been 162. The site says it is updated several times a year but I know it has not been updated in the last 2 years. All they do is change the date on the cover page.

Northern California PHRF Ratings 162 is not referenced and of unknowns origin. I emailed the list owner to get clarification and got no response. Seems like a good number to me though.

NCPHRF Base Rating Report 150 is official for Northern California set many years ago by Leda II after winning the PHRF championship the year before and being protested. Leda and David are very fast. A very high bar for all.

West Vancouver Yacht Club 188 has been used for several years up north by Bandit

PHRF of So California 174 is the handicap in Southern California enjoyed by Electra

It is also interesting to note that they give an extra 15 for non spinnaker down south. (LPW36 15)

2009 Swiftsure Race gave Winsome III a handicap of 218. He finished last, probably had some problem.

Ad by Google

The information on this web site has not been checked for accuracy. It is for entertainment purposes only and should be independently verified before using for any other reason. There are five sources. 1) Documents and manuals from a variety of sources. These have not been checked for accuracy and in many cases have not even been read by anyone associated with I have no idea of they are useful or accurate, I leave that to the reader. 2) Articles others have written and submitted. If you have questions on these, please contact the author. 3) Articles that represent my personal opinions. These are intended to promote thought and for entertainment. These are not intended to be fact, they are my opinions. 4) Small programs that generate result presented on a web page. Like any computer program, these may and in some cases do have errors. Almost all of these also make simplifying assumptions so they are not totally accurate even if there are no errors. Please verify all results. 5) Weather information is from numerious of sources and is presented automatically. It is not checked for accuracy either by anyone at or by the source which is typically the US Government. See the NOAA web site for their disclaimer. Finally, tide and current data on this site is from 2007 and 2008 data bases, which may contain even older data. Changes in harbors due to building or dredging change tides and currents and for that reason many of the locations presented are no longer supported by newer data bases. For example, there is very little tidal current data in newer data bases so current data is likely wrong to some extent. This data is NOT FOR NAVIGATION. See the XTide disclaimer for details. In addition, tide and current are influenced by storms, river flow, and other factors beyond the ability of any predictive program.