Tuesday, January19, 2021
Privacy Policy

The Last Bend

A better bend for Dyneema


I call this knot the Last Bend because it is the last in a search to find a bend that will not slip in Amsteel the way the triple fisherman's knot does. It is easy to tie and very strong, achieving average of 39% of line strength. Amsteel hates knots and this is a very high value. It also loves to slip and this knot resists slipping. On a test of 5 pulls in a calibrated setup with a load cell, two slipped at 35% until they got a 30 second rest and then did not slip. All 5 broke at about 39% of line strength.


Loop two knots together. The knot is similar to a buntline hitch but instead of a clove hitch around the standing end, use a figure of eight made just like the old familiar stopping knot.

Orient the knots so the tails both point in the same direction

Tuck the tail from one knot through the looop that the standing end goes through in the other knot.

Repeat for the other tail

Tighten up the figure of eights first.

Then pull the standing ends and tails to tighten up the knot

The knot broke

Here is my test bench (messy)

The line in the test bench

The test was a very fast pull, just a few seconds. Here is the bend -- no slip.

This next test is the "bake off" between the last bend and the triple fisherman's knot. The triple fisherman's knot is the standard in the industry for joining this kind of line.

Here is the test setup. The pull was with a 35 power winch and I pulles as fast as I could turn the winch, which took a few seconds.

The triple fisherman's knot slipped out

And here is the last bend.

More Testing

This knot was also tested by Sailinganarchy's Estar. He did 5 tests on 3/16 Amsteel. Two of the samples slipped at 1,900 pounds (35%) but held after a 30 second pause. The average breaking strength was 39% of line. This is, in his words, a vast improvement over the triple fisherman's knot which is the industry standard. It slips as low as 25% of line strength. I call this the "Last Bend" because it is the last one I am going to try and figure out. If you wanted to make it stronger, make the internal loops double because that is where it broke. But that makes it more difficult to tie and being better than the state of the art is going to have to be good enough.

Theory of the Knot

Many many bends were tested. With each test, insight on why everything slips was gained. Some of these knots were very complex with many many twists and lots of friction area. They were difficult to tie. But they all slipped

Cookie Policy:
This website uses cookies to save your settings. No personal information is saved. I do not collect statistics on your visit. You can disable cookies in your browser if you like but it is not recommended for this site. I do not sell cookies. Go to a bakery for that. In fact I do not sell anything. To disable cookies from L-36.com, please refer to the Help button in your browser.
Privacy Policy:
I do not sell or share any user data or anything else for that matter. The only personal information I save is in the site log which has a line for each page view which includes the IP address your browser sends in the header as well as which page you requested. I use this to block hackers and other bad actors. I do not use this raw data to create profiles on users. I periodically delete the log files. Google supplies the ads on this site. Because I do not track who you are, I cannot customize how these ads are served. They may be personalized to improve the ad experience. If you do not want personalized ads, please adjust the settings on the Google site HERE. NOTE: The best I can determine, this site is not subject to CCPA but I am doing my best to comply anyway.
The information on this web site has not been checked for accuracy. It is for entertainment purposes only and should be independently verified before using for any other reason. There are five sources. 1) Documents and manuals from a variety of sources. These have not been checked for accuracy and in many cases have not even been read by anyone associated with L-36.com. I have no idea of they are useful or accurate, I leave that to the reader. 2) Articles others have written and submitted. If you have questions on these, please contact the author. 3) Articles that represent my personal opinions. These are intended to promote thought and for entertainment. These are not intended to be fact, they are my opinions. 4) Small programs that generate result presented on a web page. Like any computer program, these may and in some cases do have errors. Almost all of these also make simplifying assumptions so they are not totally accurate even if there are no errors. Please verify all results. 5) Weather information is from numerous of sources and is presented automatically. It is not checked for accuracy either by anyone at L-36.com or by the source which is typically the US Government. See the NOAA web site for their disclaimer. Finally, tide and current data on this site is from 2007 and 2008 data bases, which may contain even older data. Changes in harbors due to building or dredging change tides and currents and for that reason many of the locations presented are no longer supported by newer data bases. For example, there is very little tidal current data in newer data bases so current data is likely wrong to some extent. This data is NOT FOR NAVIGATION. See the XTide disclaimer for details. In addition, tide and current are influenced by storms, river flow, and other factors beyond the ability of any predictive program.