Rings as Jib Leads
I have several articles on using rings as inhaulers and twings. This can be taken to extremes and the jib car can be eliminated and just the twing and inhauler used. It not only can be, that is how the TP-52 fleet is rigged. Here are some pictures to show it.
This is a picture I took a couple of years ago at the Big Boat Series in San Francisco of the TP-52 Mayham
This close up reveals that the jib is controlled by a twing where the twing line goes through a car on a cross deck track. There is also an inhauler up a little higher on the sheet.
The lead to the winch is provided by this fairlead which I assume is similar to the one you can see in the foreground. The forces on a TP-52 are higher than what I am going to see on my boat, but anyone designing a system like this should calculate the forces and make sure all the hardware is up to the task.
Finally you can see that the sheet is tapered so that the part that goes through the twing and inhauler rings are slippery spectra and not the cover which would be much higher friction.
Rings vs Eye-SplicesThe sharp eyed reader will notice that the twing and inhauler on the TP-52 is made from an eye splice around a thimble. The corresponding gear in the other L-36.com articles use rings and luggage tags around the rings. The eye splices are clearly stronger than the line they are made from so clearly strong enough. On the other hand, the luggage tag is going to cause significant loss of strength. Starting with twice the strength of the line in the eye of the eye splice the strength is reduced by the loss of the luggage tag. I have not measured that loss but my guess is that it is between 25 and 50% strength remaining. Thus, the resultant could be as strong or half as strong as the line. With light loads, this should not be a problem but if you have small line or heavy loads, it could be an issue. With a safety factor and assuming a significant loss due to the know, I would want line to be 10x the load or 2x the rating of the jib sheet. Assuming a 60 degree off straight for the twing as shown in the TP-52 photo, that would be two loads at 30 degrees or about the same as the line load. That would mean you want the twing line in this case to be as strong as the sheet. As you can see from the photo, they are about the same diameter line so the eye around the thimble is appropriate.
As with all strength issues, you need to ask what happens if it breaks. If an inhauler breaks, it may not be so important. If a twing breaks that is only there for off wind performance, it may also not be so important. On the other hand, if it is the only thing holding the jib sheet in place and serves as the normal fairlead, as is the case with the TP-52, it might be very important.
|For an article on calculating the friction involved in ring and line systems see THIS article.|
||HERE is an article on a single line inhauler setup.|
|HERE is the article on jib sheet twings.|
Ad by Google
I do not sell or share any user data or anything else for that matter. The only personal information I save is in the site log which has a line for each page view which includes the IP address your browser sends in the header as well as which page you requested. I use this to block hackers and other bad actors. I do not use this raw data to create profiles on users. I periodically delete the log files. If you are subject to CCPA, Google ads on this site will not be based on your past behavior so you will likely not see an ad for a lawn mower just because you looked for one at a big box website. I do not believe this site is subject to CCPA but I am doing what I can to follow the guidelines anyway.
The information on this web site has not been checked for accuracy. It is for entertainment purposes only and should be independently verified before using for any other reason. There are five sources. 1) Documents and manuals from a variety of sources. These have not been checked for accuracy and in many cases have not even been read by anyone associated with L-36.com. I have no idea of they are useful or accurate, I leave that to the reader. 2) Articles others have written and submitted. If you have questions on these, please contact the author. 3) Articles that represent my personal opinions. These are intended to promote thought and for entertainment. These are not intended to be fact, they are my opinions. 4) Small programs that generate result presented on a web page. Like any computer program, these may and in some cases do have errors. Almost all of these also make simplifying assumptions so they are not totally accurate even if there are no errors. Please verify all results. 5) Weather information is from numerous of sources and is presented automatically. It is not checked for accuracy either by anyone at L-36.com or by the source which is typically the US Government. See the NOAA web site for their disclaimer. Finally, tide and current data on this site is from 2007 and 2008 data bases, which may contain even older data. Changes in harbors due to building or dredging change tides and currents and for that reason many of the locations presented are no longer supported by newer data bases. For example, there is very little tidal current data in newer data bases so current data is likely wrong to some extent. This data is NOT FOR NAVIGATION. See the XTide disclaimer for details. In addition, tide and current are influenced by storms, river flow, and other factors beyond the ability of any predictive program.